[quote][b][url=/v3/forum/%C3%A9tats-unis-31/topic/f-35-news-195/?post=73316#post-73316]cinétic[/url] a dit le 27/02/2012 à 15:03 :[/b]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_pod

[quote]When designed to be suspension-mounted on a hardpoint on a typical post-WW II aircraft, gun pods are inherently less accurate than integral guns[/quote]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M61_Vulcan#Applications

[quote]During service in the Vietnam War the pods proved to be relatively inaccurate: the pylon mounting was not rigid enough to prevent deflection when firing, and repeated use would misalign the pod on its pylon, making matters worse.[/quote]

Je l'ai lu plusieurs fois, mais j'ai retrouvé ces 2 références pour toi.

edit: d'autres références que j'ai trouvé:

http://www.master194.com/maquettes/momo/f-16-cas/index.htm

[quote]Les essais montrèrent également que la nacelle canon était fort instable du fait de la force de recul du canon.[/quote]

http://www.f-16.net/f-16_versions_article18.html

[quote]The F-16s from the 174th were deployed to the Persian Gulf during Desert Storm, but the project proved to be a miserable failure. Precision aiming was impossible for several reasons:

    The pylon mount isn't as steady as the A-10's rigid mounting;
    The F-16 flies much faster than an A-10, giving the pilots too little time approaching the target;
    Firing the gun shook the aircraft harshly and made it impossible to control;
    Essential CCIP (continuously computed impact point) software was unavailable. 

Pilots ended up using the gun as an area effect weapon, spraying multiple targets with ammunition, producing an effect rather like a cluster bomb. It took only a couple of days of this before they gave up, unbolted the gun pods, and went back to dropping real cluster bombs - which did the job more effectively.

The F/A-16C plan was quietly forgotten. The USAF still has plans to replace the A-10 with F-16s, but they no longer involve 30mm gun pods (or, apparently, a designation with an "A" in it).
	[/quote]

Après si on m'a menti sur tous ces articles, c'est pas de ma faute mais ça me semble pourtant bien cohérent tout ça Sharky :salut:[/quote]