[quote][b][url=/v3/forum/portes-avions-39/topic/les-porte-avions-126/?post=23157#post-23157]ex-mijou[/url] a dit le 03/05/2008 à 01:54 :[/b]

Si on les "débarasse" du kitty hawk on devrai penser a réactiver les crusader.

on n'aura jamais assez d'avions pour le remplir a sa capacité max (90 je crois)!

puis il faudra songer a sa remise en condition opérationelle 

[quote] From 1987 to 1991 Kitty Hawk was overhauled for $785 million under the Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) at Philadelphia Naval Shipyard.[4] From 1990 to 1992, Constellation received her $800 million service life extension also in Philadelphia.[5] The program was intended to add 15 years to the life of the ships. John F. Kennedy was not overhauled as part of SLEP. Instead from 1993 to 1995, she received a $491 million overhaul. It was the final project of Philadelphia Naval Shipyard prior to its closing.[6] America had been scheduled to be overhauled under the service life extension program after Constellation, but she was decommissioned 9 August 1996 instead, during a time of budget cuts after the Cold War. America was in very poor condition when she was decommissioned, and therefore despite her historical significance was not held as a donation asset. She was expended as a live-fire target and sunk on 14 May 2005.[/quote]

Ca c'est le prix en 87! j'ose pas savoir combien ça coûtera de nos jours :lol: 

a ce prix je préfère le PA2 . mais si nos amis Américains acceptaient de payer ca pour nous.. c'est ca l'amitié non? :lol:[/quote]